Kim等[2]研究发现不同性别、年级、学科和性格的学生在使用不同的平台搜寻信息的频率和使用目的方面有显著差异。Sin[3]研究了性别—年级、问题解决方式等特征对留学生的信息源使用以及日常生活信息搜寻的差异性影响。基于社会化媒体学术信息搜寻行为影响因素调查所收集的273个样本,采用独立样本t检验和单因素方差分析的统计分析方法对分组样本进行比较。......
2023-08-03
(1)开发和检验信息需求变量的测量量表
信息需求是驱动社会化媒体环境下用户产生学术信息搜寻行为的重要因素之一,而信息需求是一个复杂的、模糊的、难以直接测量的潜在构念,为满足用户的信息需求,首先要准确判断和识别用户的信息需求。然而,现有研究对信息需求的描述和测量缺乏系统性和准确性,本书从信息科学研究视角出发,分析用户信息行为研究中信息需求的特征,运用定性研究和定量研究相结合的研究方法拟定测量信息需求变量的题项,并逐步对其进行筛选和检验,直至最终确定信息需求变量的有效测量量表,为精确地测量用户信息需求以及探讨不同信息需求水平调节下社会化媒体用户学术信息搜寻行为的规律提供理论依据。
(2)揭示信息需求调节下社会化媒体用户学术信息搜寻行为的影响因素及其作用效果
社会化媒体拓宽了学术信息行为研究的范围,但也加剧了用户学术信息行为的动态复杂性,增加了其研究难度。社会化媒体环境下,用户获取和搜寻学术信息等行为受到个性特征、信息源可信度、信息质量、系统质量、服务质量等多种因素的影响。对于无法直接观测的潜在变量间的因果关系,通过问卷调查收集一手数据,采用偏最小二乘法的结构化方程建模方法,创新性地结合用户个性特征、信息质量、系统质量、服务质量、信息源可信度等多个方面的因素,基于精细加工可能性模型,系统地揭示社会化媒体用户学术信息搜寻行为的前置动因及其作用效果,同时,将信息需求纳入研究模型作为调节变量,探讨信息需求对社会化媒体用户学术信息搜寻行为及其影响的调节作用与影响规律。
(3)从多个不同角度比较社会化媒体用户学术信息搜寻行为及其影响因素的差异性感知
用户个性特征不仅包括性别、年龄、身份、学科等基本特征,还包括学术研究经验、社会化媒体使用经验、性格特征等。个性特征的差异将用户划分为不同的群体,不同的用户群体在使用社会化媒体参与各种学术信息活动过程中的行为表现会有所不同。本书创新性地从用户个人的生理特征和心理特征的角度,利用独立样本t检验、方差分析等方法分析具有不同个性特征的用户在社会化媒体环境下的学术信息搜寻行为及其影响上的感知差异,从多个不同角度揭示社会化媒体用户的学术信息搜寻行为及其影响因素在均值差异上的规律,便于更好地引导用户的学术信息搜寻行为,为不同用户群体提供针对性的信息服务,满足他们的信息需求,实现社会化媒体环境下学术信息资源的优化配置和效用最大化。
【注释】
[1]Grajales III FJ,Sheps S,Ho K,et al.Social media:A review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care[J].Journal of Medical Internet Research,2014,16(2),https://www.jmir.org/2014/2/e13/.
[2]Oh O,Agrawal M,Rao H R.Community intelligence and social media services:A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises[J].MIS Quarterly,2013,37(2):407-426.
[3]盛宇.基于微博的学术信息交流机制研究——以新浪微博为例[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(14):62-66.
[4]孔繁超.基于新浪微博的图书馆学人意见领袖调查与分析[J].大学图书馆学报,2013(2):55-59.
[5]Johnson K A.The effect of Twitter posts on students'perceptions of instructor credibility[J].Learning,Media and Technology,2011,36(1):21-38.
[6]Gu F,Widén-Wulff G.Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media:A Finnish case study[J].The Electronic Library,2011,29(6):762-776.
[7]Tenopir C,Volentine R,King D W.Social media and scholarly reading[J].Online Information Review,2013,37(2):193-216.
[8]Mandavilli A.Peer review:Trial by Twitter[J].Nature,2011,469(7330):286-287.
[9]Haustein S,Peters I,Sugimoto C R,et al.Tweeting biomedicine:an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(4):656-669.
[10]Rowlands I,Nicholas D,Russell B,et al.Social media use in the research workf low[J].Learned Publishing,2011,24(3):183-195.
[11]Kim K S,Sin SCJ,Tsai TI.Individual differences in social media use for information seeking[J].The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2014,40(2):171-178.
[12]Veletsianos G.Higher education scholars'participation and practices on Twitter[J].Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,2012,28(4):336-349.
[13]Ebner M,Lienhardt C,Rohs M,et al.Microblogs in higher education— A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning?[J].Computers&Education,2010,55(1):92-100.
[14]Dunlap J C,Lowenthal P R.Horton hears a tweet[J].Educause Quarterly,2009,32(4):1-11.
[15]Haustein S,Peters I,Sugimoto C R,et al.Tweeting biomedicine:An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(4):656-669.
[16]Letierce J,Passant A,Decker S,et al.Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientif ic messages[C].Proceedings of the Web Science Conference,2010,http://journal.webscience.org/314/2/websci10_submission_79.pdf.
[17]Ross C,Terras M,Warwick C,et al.Enabled backchannel:Conference Twitter use by digital humanists[J].Journal of Documentation,2011,67(2):214-237.
[18]Valentine B.The legitimate effort in research papers:Student commitment versus faculty expectations[J].The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2001,27(2):107-115.
[19]Kane GC,Alavi M,Labianca G,et al.What's different about social media networks?A framework and research agenda[J].MIS Quarterly,2014,38(1):275-304.
[20]Cole C.A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2011,62(7):1216-1231.
[21]Eager C,Oppenheim C.An observational method for undertaking user needs studies[J].Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,1996,28(1):15-23.
[22]Bawden D.Users,user studies and human information behaviour[J].Journal of Documentation,2006,62(6):671-679.
[23]Gruzd A,Staves K,Wilk A.Connected scholars:Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2012,28:2340-2350.
[24]Wei K K,Teo H H,Chan H C,et al.Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide[J].Information Systems Research,2011,22(1):170-187.
[25]Wang S,Lin J C C.The effect of social influence on bloggers'usage intention[J].Online Information Review,2011,35(1):50-65.
[26]Lim S.How and why do college students use Wikipedia?[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2009,60(11):2189-2202.
[27]Yeh N C,Lin JCC,Lu H P.The moderating effect of social roles on user behaviour in virtual worlds[J].Online Information Review,2011,35(5):747-769.
[28]Lu H P,Hsiao K L.Gender differences in reasons for frequent blog posting[J].Online Information Review,2009,33(1):135-156.
[29]Han E,Lee S W.Motivations for the complementary use of text-based media during linear TV viewing:An exploratory study[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2014,32:235-243.
[30]Whiting A,Williams D.Why people use social media:A uses and gratifications approach[J].Qualitative Market Research:An International Journal,2013,16(4):362-369.
[31]Aharony N.Twitter use by three political leaders: An exploratory analysis[J].Online Information Review,2012,36(4):587-603.
[32]Chung D S,Kim S.Blogging activity among cancer patients and their companions:Uses,gratifications,and predicators of outcomes[J].Journal of the American society for Information Science and Technology,2008,59(2):297-306.
[33]Williamson K,Qayyum A,Hider P,et al.Young adults and everyday-life information:The role of news media[J].Library and Information Science Research,2012,34(4):258-264.
[34]Hughes D J,Rowe M,Batey M,et al.A tale of two sites:Twitter vs.Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2012,28(2):561-569.
[35]Kim K S,Sin SCJ,Tsai TI.Individual differences in social media use for information seeking[J].The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2014,40(2):171-178.
[36]Lu Y,Yang D.Information exchange in virtual communities under extreme disaster conditions[J].Decision Support Systems,2011,50(2):529-538.
[37]Fullwood C,Melrose K,Morris N,et al.Sex,blogs,and baring your soul:Factors influencing UK blogging strategies[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2013,64(2):345-355.
[38]Heverin T,Zach L.Use of microblogging for collective sense-making during violent crises:A study of three campus shootings[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(1):34-47.
[39]Tan W K,Tan C H,Teo H H.Conveying information effectively in a virtual world:Insights from synthesized task closure and media richness[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(6):1198-1212.
[40]Robelia B A,Greenhow C,Burton L.Environmental learning in online social networks:Adopting environmentally responsible behaviors[J].Environmental Education Research,2011,17(4):553-575.
[41]Bae Y,Lee H.Sentiment analysis of Twitter audiences:Measuring the positive or negative of popular twitterers[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(13):2521-2535.
[42]Abrahamson J A,Rubin V L.Discourse structure differences in lay and professional health communication[J].Journal of Documentation,2012,68(6):826-851.
[43]Oh S.The characteristics and motivations of health answerers for sharing information,knowledge,and experiences in online environment[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(3):543-557.
[44]Cho H,Chen M,Chung S.Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of Wikipedia[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2010,61(6):1198-1212.
[45]Lee D,Park JY,Kim J,et al.Understanding music sharing behaviour on social network services[J].Online Information Review,2011,35(5):716-733.
[46]Chiu CM,Wang ET G,Shih F J,et al.Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities:An integration of expectancy disconfirmation and justice theories[J].Online Information Review,2011,35(1):134-153.
[47]Lee C S,Ma L.News sharing in social media:The effect of gratifications and prior experience[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2012,28(2):331-339.
[48]Wang W T,Wei Z H.Knowledge sharing in wiki communities:An empirical study[J].Online Information Review,2011,35(5):799-820.
[49]Jansen B J,Sobel K,Cook G.Classifying ecommerce information sharing behavior by youths on social networking sites[J].Journal of Information Science,2011,37(2):120-136.
[50]O'Connor L G.Investors'information sharing and use in virtual communities[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2013,64(1):36-47.
[51]Chung D S,Kim S.Blogging activity among cancer patients and their companions:Uses,gratifications,and predicators of outcomes[J].Journal of the American society for Information Science and Technology,2008,59(2):297-306.
[52]Park J H,Gu B,Leung A C M,et al.An investigation of information sharing and seeking behaviors in online investment communities[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2014,31:1-12.
[53]Stieglitz S,Dang-Xuan L.Emotions and information diffusion in social media—Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior[J].Journal of Management Information Systems,2013,29(4):217-247.
[54]Gruzd A,Staves K,Wilk A.Connected scholars:Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2012,28:2340-2350.
[55]Collins E, Hide B.Use and relevance of web 2.0 resources for researchers[C].In Paper presented at the International Conference on Electronic Publishing,Helsinki,Finland,16-18 June,2010:271-289.
[56]Rowlands I,Nicholas D,Russell B,et al.Social media use in the research workflow[J].Learned Publishing,2011,24(3):183-195.
[57]Gruzd A,Wellman B,Takhteyev Y.Imagining twitter as an imagined community[J].American Behavioural Scientist,2011,55(10):1294-1318.
[58]Mandavilli A.Peer review:Trial by Twitter[J].Nature,2011,469(7330):286-287.
[59]Gruzd A,Staves K,Wilk A.Connected scholars:Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2012,28:2340-2350.
[60]Veletsianos G.Higher education scholars'participation and practices on Twitter[J].Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,2012,28(4):336-349.
[61]Gu F,Widén-Wulff G.Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media:A Finnish case study[J].The Electronic Library,2011,29(6):762-776.
[62]Tenopir C, Volentine R, King D W.Social media and scholarly reading[J].Online Information Review,2013,37(2):193-216.
[63]Ponte D,Simon J.Scholarly communication 2.0:Exploring researchers' opinions on Web 2.0 for scientific knowledge creation, evaluation, and dissemination[J].Serials Review,2011,37(3):149-156.
[64]Veletsianos G.Higher education scholars'participation and practices on Twitter[J].Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,2012,28(4):336-349.
[65]Jimoyiannis A, Angelaina S.Towards an analysis framework for investigating students'engagement and learning in educational blogs[J].Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,2012,28:222-234.
[66]Martin S,Diaz G,Sancristobal E,et al.New technology trends in education:Seven years of forecasts and convergence[J].Computers&Education,2011,57:1893-1906.
[67]Sadaf A,Newby T J,Ertmer P A.Exploring pre-service teachers'beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom[J].Computers&Education,2012,59:937-945.
[68]Escobar-Rodríguez T,Carvajal-Trujillo E,Monge-Lozano P.Factors that influence the perceived advantages and relevance of Facebook as a learning tool:An extension of the UTAUT[J].Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,2014,30(2):136-151.
[69]Fourie I.A call for libraries to go green:An information behaviour perspective to draw interest from twenty-first century librarians[J].Library Hi Tech,2012,30(3):428-435.
[70]Wilson T D.Information needs and uses:Fifty years of progress?[J].Fifty Years of Information Progress:A Journal of Documentation Review,1994:15-51.
[71]Naumer CM,Fisher K E.Information needs[M].In Bates M J,Maack M N(Eds.),Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences(3rd ed.).London:Taylor&Francis,2010:2452-2458.
[72]Taylor R S.Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries[J].College&Research Libraries,1968,29(3):178-194.
[73]Wersig G.Informationssoziologie.Hinweise zu einem informationswissens- chaftlichen Teilbereich[Information sociology.References to a sub-field of information science][M].Frankfurt am Main,Germany:Athenäum Fischer,1973.
[74]Wilson T D.On user studies and information needs[J].Journal of Documentation,1981,37(1):3-15.
[75]Ormandy P.Defining information need in health-Assimilating complex theories derived from information science[J].Health Expectations,2011,14(1):92-104.
[76]Savolainen R.Elaborating the motivational attributes of information need and uncertainty[J].Information Research,2012,17(2),http://informationr.net/ir/17-2/paper516.html.
[77]Raper J.Geographic relevance[J].Journal of Documentation,2007,63(6):836-852.
[78]Popper K.Objective Knowledge:An evolutionary approach[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1973.
[79]Kari J.Diversity in the conceptions of information use[J].Information Research,2010,15(3),http://informationr.net/ir/15-3/colis7/colis709.html.
[80]wigońM.Information limits:Definition,typology and types[J].Aslib Proceedings,2011,63(4):364-379.
[81]Choo CW.The knowing organization:How organizations use information to construct meaning,create knowledge,and make decisions(2nd ed.)[M].New York,NY:Oxford University Press,2006.
[82]Ingwersen P.Cognitive analysis and the role of the intermediary in information retrieval[M].In Davies R(Ed.),Intelligent Information Systems.Chichester,West Sussex:Horwood,1986:206-237.
[83]Cole C.A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2011,62(7):1216-1231.
[84]Taylor R S.Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries[J].College&Research Libraries,1968,29(3):178-194.
[85]Dervin B,Nilan M.Information needs and uses[J].Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,1986,21:3-33.
[86]Wilson T D.On user studies and information needs[J].Journal of Documentation,2006,62(6):658-670.
[87]Harter SP.Psychological relevance and information science[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1992,43(9):602-615.
[88]Westbrook L.E-government support for people in crisis:An evaluation of police department website support for domestic violence survivors using person-insituation information need analysis[J].Library and Information Science Research,2008,30(1):22-38.
[89]Agosto D E,Hughes-Hassell S.Toward a model of the everyday life information needs of urban teenagers.Part 1:Theoretical model[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(10):1394-1403.
[90]Agosto D E,Hughes-Hassell S.Toward a model of the everyday life information needs of urban teenagers.Part 2:Empirical model[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(11):1418-1426.
[91]Byström K,Järvelin K.Task complexity affects information seeking and use[J].Information Processing&Management,1995,31(2):191-213.
[92]Saastamoinen M,Kumpulainen S,Vakkari P,et al.Task complexity affects information use:A questionnaire study in city administration[J].Information Research,2013,18(4),http://informationr.net/ir/18-4/paper592.html.
[93]Greenberg R,Bar-Ilan J.Information needs of students in Israel—A case study of a multicultural society[J].Journal of Academic librarianship,2014,40:185-191.
[94]Chow A S,Baity CC,Zamarripa M,et al.The information needs of virtual users:A study of Second Life libraries[J].The Library Quarterly,2012,82(4):477-510.
[95]Savolainen R.Conceptualizing information need in context[J].Information Research,2012,17(4),http://informationr.net/ir/17-4/paper534.html.
[96]Savolainen R.Elaborating the motivational attributes of information need and uncertainty[J].Information Research,2012,17(2),http://informationr.net/ir/17-2/paper516.html.
[97]Savolainen R.Expectancy-value beliefs and information needs as motivators for task-based information seeking[J].Journal of Documentation,2012,68(4):492-511.
[98]Huurne E T,Gutteling J.Information needs and risk perception as predictors of risk information seeking[J].Journal of Risk Research,2008,11(7):847-862.
[99]Lu L,Yuan Y C.Shall I google it or ask the competent villain down the hall?The moderating role of information need in information source selection[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2011,62(1):133-145.
[100]Cole C.A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2011,62(7):1216-1231.
[101]Borlund P,Dreier S.An investigation of the search behaviour associated with Ingwersen's three types of information needs[J].Information Processing&Management,2014,50:493-507.
[102]魏登柏,李晶,尹敬刚.网络信息交流方式转移研究:从即时通信到社交网络[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(3):42-46.
[103]赵国洪,陈创前.“微博问政”现象的实证研究——基于新浪微博的分析[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(6):51-55,116.
[104]郑烨.政务微博中的信息交流与信息公开——信任的中介作用[J].情报杂志,2012,31(10):156-164.
[105]钱颖,汪守金,金晓玲,等.基于用户年龄的微博信息分享行为研究[J].情报杂志,2012,31(11):14-18.
[106]王明辉,李宗波.大学生博客写作动机的实证解析[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2009,49(2):142-146.
[107]谢佳琳,张晋朝.用户在线生成内容意愿影响因素研究[J].信息资源管理学报,2014(1):69-77.
[108]蔡剑,詹庆东.研究生群体网络信息分享行为动机研究[J].图书情报知识,2012(2):81-86.
[109]李枫林,周莎莎.虚拟社区信息分享行为研究[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(20):48-51.
[110]赵越岷,李梦俊,陈华平.虚拟社区中消费者信息共享行为影响因素的实证研究[J].管理学报,2010,7(10):1490-1494,1501.
[111]张素芳,卢朝金.虚拟社区中的群体信息行为调查分析[J].情报科学,2012,30(4):563-566.
[112]王明辉,李宗波,赵国祥.大学生博客行为动机与人格特征的关系[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(2):230-231,215.
[113]李枫林,臧颖.网络消费者协同信息行为研究[J].情报理论与实践,2011,34(10):10-12,4.
[114]周珏.网络环境下群体用户的信息行为研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2010.
[115]汪向征,葛彦强.传播学视域下教育技术微群用户信息行为分析[J].中国电化教育,2012(9):27-31.
[116]吕臣.基于社会网络分析理论的社交网站信息交流特征案例分析[D].天津:天津师范大学,2012.
[117]袁毅,杨成明.微博客用户信息交流过程中形成的不同社会网络及其关系实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(12):31-35.
[118]袁毅,杨成明.微博客用户交流的机制、结构及特征研究[J].图书馆论坛,2010,30(6):82-86.
[119]盛宇.基于微博的学术信息交流机制研究——以新浪微博为例[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(14):62-66.
[120]王健,周国民,王剑,等.认知导向信息需求研究综述[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(10):136-141.
[121]肖仙桃,王丹丹.用户信息环境、信息行为及信息需求发展趋势[J].图书馆理论与实践,2010(1):40-43.
[122]冯花朴.用户信息需求研究发展[J].图书情报工作,2006,50(2):40-44.
[123]郭韫丽,孔令保,程新.高校教师信息需求和信息行为相关性研究——以江西农业大学为例[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(4):89-93.
[124]陈煜,袁曦临,刘忠斌.南京图书馆用户信息需求和信息行为调研[J].新世纪图书馆,2013(3):87-91.
[125]茆意宏,彭爱东,黄水清.农民信息需求与行为的区域比较研究——以江苏省为例[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(12):49-53,80.
[126]王良成.网络环境下大学生信息需求与利用行为调查研究[J].情报 科学,2002,20(2):217-221.
[127]邱子恒.中文系教师信息行为之研究:以辅仁大学为例[J].中国图 书馆学报,2011,37(3):61-74.
[128]魏力更.高校网络用户信息需求与信息行为研究[J].情报资料工 作,2005(5):103-105.
[129]黄清芬.用户信息需求探析[J].情报杂志,2004(7):38-40.
[130]赵伯兴,李利方.用户信息需求的诊断方法研究[J].情报理论与实践,2007,31(6):791-793,804.
[131]张爱民.农民信息需求识别与确定研究[J].晋图学刊,2012(1):68-71.
[132]李枫林,何洲芳.面向用户潜在信息需求的检索结果组织研究[J].情报理论与实践,2011,34(5):42-45.
[133]Wildemuth B M.Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science[M].Englewood,CO:Libraries Unlimited,2009.
Kim等[2]研究发现不同性别、年级、学科和性格的学生在使用不同的平台搜寻信息的频率和使用目的方面有显著差异。Sin[3]研究了性别—年级、问题解决方式等特征对留学生的信息源使用以及日常生活信息搜寻的差异性影响。基于社会化媒体学术信息搜寻行为影响因素调查所收集的273个样本,采用独立样本t检验和单因素方差分析的统计分析方法对分组样本进行比较。......
2023-08-03
近年来,社会化媒体被大众用户广泛地接受和使用,正在不断地渗入人们的日常生活当中,社会化媒体在信息生产、传播与获取过程中扮演着重要角色,逐渐成为主流。各个领域的学者逐渐开始对社会化媒体的相关问题展开研究。学者们认为社会化媒体不仅有助于同行之间的协作与交流,而且便于信息的传播与扩散。大多数研究人员认为社会化媒体工具不仅仅是一种潮流,更代表着学者们交流、合作、获取、共享和传播知识与信息方式的变化。......
2023-08-03
[75]信息搜寻行为指用户有目的地搜寻信息以实现某项目标,被认为是一个意义建构的过程,个体在这一过程中搜索与其个人观点相匹配的信息,以支持其减少不确定性并作出决策,从而理性地解决问题。Jiang[83]研究基于Web 2.0站点的社会图书馆系统环境下用户的信息搜寻模式,发现大多数用户倾向于合并两种或更多的模式,而每个用户通常有一个占据主导地位的模式。......
2023-08-03
根据Taylor信息需求模型中信息需求的模糊性和不易表达的特征以及Wilson对信息需求问题的探究,研究人员对信息需求问题的研究重点转向了信息需求发生的情境,这使得用户信息需求产生的情境变得非常重要。从计算机科学视角出发的用户信息需求研究主要关注的是Taylor模型中后两个水平的信息需求,即正式的信息需求和妥协的信息需求,属于可以被具体描述的需求。......
2023-08-03
本章通过一对一面谈与一对一在线访谈相结合的方式进行访谈资料收集。其中,时间维度涉及信息获取的时效性和及时性;数量涉及满足信息需求的信息量;任务涉及问题或特定任务驱动的信息需求;内容维度涉及满足信息需求的内容质量、信息类型;对应马斯洛的需求层次,信息需求又可以归纳为生理层面的信息需求、认知层面的信息需求和情感层面的信息需求等。......
2023-08-03
为了进一步分析造成这一结果的原因,这里将信息有用性作为固定因变量,系统质量作为固定自变量,其他变量单独或两两同时进入回归模型进行分析,结果如表4-7所示,可以看到,当服务质量和信息源可信度同时进入回归模型后,系统质量对信息有用性的影响不再显著,如表4-7中的模型7所示,说明用户在判断社会化媒体中学术信息有用性的时候,系统质量会因为用户重视服务质量和信息源可信度而对用户判断信息有用性不再有明显的影响。......
2023-08-03
信息需求对信息质量与信息有用性之间关系的调节作用表明社会化媒体环境下用户学术信息搜寻行为的特殊性以及社会化媒体中学术信息对于用户需求的潜在影响作用。图4-3信息需求对信息质量与信息有用性之间关系的调节效应精细加工可能性模型认为精细加工可能性水平变量对中枢路径与用户态度变化之间的关系具有正向调节作用,据此,本书假设信息需求对信息质量与信息有用性之间的关系具有正向调节作用,但结果发现研究假设不成立。......
2023-08-03
Taylor认为在本能的信息需求层次上,信息需求表现为一种对信息不满足的模糊状态,它是真实存在的,但用语言难以表达出来。在Taylor提出该信息需求模型之后,学者们针对该模型进行了大量讨论。因此,在解释用户进行信息搜寻的原因时,Taylor的模型并不能被定性为一个成熟的方法。而信息行为研究则从Taylor理论的前两个需求水平出发,从认知科学的角度探讨用户的信息需求问题,研究的是用户模糊的未能清晰表达出来的信息需求问题。......
2023-08-03
相关推荐